Boulard83 4 Posted December 1, 2011 D'autres chart intéressante. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[Camp] 0 Posted January 13, 2012 Q2 2k12 c'est toujours d'actualité? Pcq c'est à ce moment la que je viens de décider que j'allais changer mon plus que vieux Q6600 hahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted January 13, 2012 Je dirais même peut-être fin Q1 ou très bientot ya des bench de E3770k qui sont sortie donc les ES chip sont déjà fonctionnel à un stade avancé. Les board Z77 sont aussi sorti au CES donc j'imagine que ça s'en viens vite. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted January 13, 2012 Ivy Bridge platform will pop up by 1H 2012 or in Early March 2012 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Entraide-net 0 Posted January 14, 2012 Attend avril, les intel ivy et les nvidia kepler devraient être sorties ... ;oP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prestone 0 Posted February 7, 2012 L'Ivy Bridge-EP LGA2011 se montre : 10 coeurs, 30Mo de L3 ! Coolaler est décidément toujours aussi prompt à mettre la main sur les CPU Engineering Samples d'Intel, puisque le voilà en possession maintenant d'un Ivy Bridge-EP, c'est à dire la version professionnelle (Xeon) des futurs processeurs 22nm mais pas en LGA1155 mais bien LGA2011 (le pendant donc des Ivy Bridge-E). L'occasion de découvrir un processeur très impressionnant, puisqu'affiché à 10 coeurs (donc 20 threads avec l'HT) et la bagatelle de 30Mo de cache L3 ! Pour rappel, les Sandy Bridge-EP sont eux limités à 8 coeurs au maximum et 20Mo de L3. L'exemplaire de présérie testé est de plus loin d'avoir une fréquence de fonctionnement totalement asthmatique, puisqu'il mouline tout de même à 2.8GHz. Autre information qui pourrait bien en découler : si Intel continue à proposer des versions grand public avec 2 coeurs de moins, les Ivy Bridge-E devraient donc être proposés en Core i7 à 8 coeurs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted February 7, 2012 bon bon ! ! ! Jvais me sentir tout nue dans la rue ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted February 7, 2012 (edited) J'ai l'impression que les version 10/20 seront des Xeon seulement. Si il y à des version "mainstream" j'imagine que ce sera des Xtrem à 1000$ et ++ .... 600$ pour mon 3930K c'est déjà environ le double de ce qu j'ai payer tous mes autre proco à vie ..... Jne pense pas aller vers du Xtrem sauf si jgagne des millions jvous en paie chacun un ! ( ceux qui le mérite ) Avec 6/12 je trouve que rien ne peut me ralentir. La video de Diablo3 que j'ai fait est en 100% qualité, 50% frame size. Les 5 minutes pèse 3.3gig et le jeux tourne bien avec la compression à 6 threads. Reste 5 autre threads pour le jeux et le reste. Edited February 7, 2012 by Boulard83 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stee 0 Posted February 7, 2012 jvous en paie chacun un ! ( ceux qui le mérite )avec ou sans la carte mere? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted February 7, 2012 jvous en paie chacun un ! ( ceux qui le mérite )avec ou sans la carte mere? Faudrait que je commence par m'acheter des billet de loto ... ça doit faire 3-4 ans que j'ai pas acheté ça ... Si oui, disont un Xtrem sur la mobo que tu as ou de ton choix mais à tes frais Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MaLiXs 0 Posted February 7, 2012 moi je prendrais pas un xtrem mais un pc complet en i3 sans le GPU sa vas être moin cher que le xtrem mets tu gangne au loto mas tenvoyer les facture XD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted February 24, 2012 http://www.guru3d.com/fullimage.php?image=37020 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prestone 0 Posted February 24, 2012 Sniff, toute cette belle place gaspillée pour un gpu tellement inutile... Ils pourraient en faire avec 6 coeurs quand même... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted February 24, 2012 Effectivement. Je crois qu'un 6 coeurs est dans les prévisions pour les IB mais les 8 et 10 coeurs seront sur IB-E. Tsé intel sont pas fou et veulent vendre leur gros chipset 10 coeurs, 20 threads ! Ça va être fou les Xeon sur X79. $$ $$ $$ mais Fun Fun Fun Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prestone 0 Posted February 25, 2012 j'en bave déjà... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted March 7, 2012 test ! http://www.anandtech.com/show/5626/ivy-bridge-preview-core-i7-3770k Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted April 13, 2012 (edited) Ouan ... j'ai plus trop envie d'attendre les Ivy pour le next build ... I have two older Engineering Samples stepping 8 (E0) and they are really good "on air" Ocers. Retail E1 stepping 9 is noticeably worse. It is worse than any Sandy Bridge. All Sandy Bridge I saw last year are better than all available E1 Retail stepping Core i7-3770K!. Ivy Bridge E1 is not good on air ocer! Do not buy them instead of your 5 GHz Sandy! Only for LN2, there make sense ... never for on air ocing! Keep your 5+GHz Sandies, no E1 Ivy is capable that clock on air. PS. This is first time in last ten years, i dont recommend "on air" overclockers to upgrade older Intel CPUs for new. Source: obr - hardware ...is this serious? is really first generation trigate 3D guilty ? NEW DATA ADDED Why is Ivy Bridge HOT, power hunger and bad clocker? - immatured 22nm process ... Maybe you know, Ivy Bridge are around the corner. Maybe you knows too, they are worst clocker then Sandy Bridge. We know why ... As you know, Intel is with the 22nm production late. Production is not good, and there are big problems with the chips. The original "on paper" concept of 22nm chip with Tri-gate transistors is extremely low supply voltage. But, with current revisions Intel can not keep voltage in planned values. This is a problem. The chips have a higher voltage than planned, broadly comparable with Sandy Bridge. And that's wrong. Tri-gate transistor needs to switch to a lower voltage. But for a correct recognition of the I/O status needs more current than planar transistor. Three-gate area is greater than one-gate and the current is several times higher than in Sandy Bridge chips. When Intel reach a planned low voltage, everything will be fine. Lower voltage means acceptable currents, less leakage and a great consumption. Unfortunately, it does not meet the current "E1" revision. Current 22nm chips have high voltage, higher than they should have. The values are similar to Sandy Bridge chips. Properly should be the default voltage below 1V and it is not now. But Ivy Bridge needs a lower voltage, at the same voltage as Sandy Bridge consumption and temperature is significantly higher due to higher currents in the chip. Basic Ivy Bridge idle voltage is above 1V, higher than Sandy Bridge. The load voltage is lower than that of Sandy Bridge and consumption is lower, but temperatures are higher. If the Ivy Bridge voltage increases, consumption and temperatures extremely jumps up. This problem can be solved only by improving the production, so maybe its time for another revision. Indeed it may be a potential problem in laptops with the highest third-generation Core i7 models. In the desktop this problem occur with less overclocking than Sandy Bridge and significantly higher power consumption and temperatures. If you have a nice 5GHz + Sandy Bridge, keep it for now. Ivy Bridge ends with overclocking on the air somewhere around 4.6 to 4.7 GHz. But slightly lower overclocking then Sandies compensates higher performance per clock, so it is not a major problem. Source:OBR intel a annoncé qu'ils repousse un peu les I3 aussi.... s'en est la cause ? Edited April 13, 2012 by Boulard83 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RicMX3 1 Posted April 14, 2012 Moi qui vient de vendre mon i7 920 pour acheter un Ivy pour mon HTPC. Je vais attendre leur sortit officiel pour comparer clock vs clock en le SB et YB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted April 14, 2012 Si tu ne comptes pas faire d'OC extreme, GO ! C'est passé un certain Vcore que ça monte en flèche. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted April 23, 2012 Les reviews de Ivy commence à exploser de partout. C'était annoncé pour le 23 mais c'est sortie tard ajd, hier soir vers 1h30 du matin il n'y avait rien d'officiellement sortie. Allez sur votre site favorie, il devrait y avoir des reviews Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted April 23, 2012 (edited) Belle conclusion sur VRzone Recommendations / Lessons: •Clock for clock, Ivy Bridge (which is a "Tick" on Intel's roadmap) does offer performance improvements over Sandy Bridge, albeit mostly in single digit percentages. This is good news as the new processors will directly replace the old ones at roughly the same price points. •From the large pool of CPUs that we have tested/binned, Ivy Bridge uses 25% less power on average clock for clock due to the lower voltages required (in this case Sandy's 1.48v to Ivy's 1.27v). •Ivy Bridge's on-die temperatures (TJ Max of 105 degrees celsius) are a lot higher than Sandy Bridge, indicating possible high electrical leakage on the new process or a different measurement method. Note: Temperatures != Power, although there is some correlation. •Ivy Bridge is a (subzero) overclocker's wet dream, able to hit core frequencies near 7GHz with no cold bugs (unless motherboard induced). •In general, Z77 boards are better made and engineered (shorter electrical traces, better component placement) than their P67/Z68 predecessors, doing away with niggling BIOS firmware bugs and dodgy VRM implementations. •According to roadmaps, Ivy Bridge is the end of the road for Socket 1155 (next year's Intel "Haswell" CPUs will on Socket 1150), head for Socket 2011 if you need more than quad cores/16 PCIe lanes. •X79 is a better platform than Z77 if you need more than 16 PCIe lanes for 3-way/4-way GPU operation without the use of latency inducing switches. •If you already have a Sandy Bridge 2500K/2600K/2700K, stick with it as there is hardly any tangible reason to fork out US$212-$313 for a minor upgrade Read more: http://vr-zone.com/articles/ivy-bridge-vs-sandy-bridge--4.8ghz-quad-core-cpu-showdown/15637.html#ixzz1sssDxYbX Edited April 23, 2012 by Boulard83 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prestone 0 Posted April 24, 2012 C'est aujourd'hui que plusieurs d'entre nous passerons notre tour! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boulard83 4 Posted April 24, 2012 C'est aujourd'hui que plusieurs d'entre nous passerons notre tour! Malheureusement Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
