1o80B

on peux aps tous etre bon comme toi mec

le Bitspower X-Station a l'air cool, mais sa me fais presque peur passer le 24 pin dans un bidule comme c¸a, j'aimerais voir si la stabilité du courant reste la même... Ya quand même 4 relais mecaniques

ok ....Ta l'air d'un bidoulleur, tsé le genre de gars trailer park avec un PC beige qui sent la cigarette Tu ma déja dis que tu éais tech pour des compagnies, comme ELMO fais... j,en doute de plus en plus, tes idées sont farfelues et surtout Heepee environnemental.... Cool pour les pieces a 1$. Stock récent pas nécéssaire sous linux? heuuu tu me niaise ? que tu sois en Windows, Linux, Unix, DOS, plus ta de bandwith, plus tu encode vite. Monter des PC avant un lan ? MOUAHHAHAHAHAHAH ostie sa doit prendre 2 jours avant de jouer avec des pieces a 1$ pour etre pas foutu de jouer a Starcraft 1 avec 20 fps... un serveur GUI = pas juste ça a faire des cris de TAB pour trouver le reste des commandes comme quand je prog un routeur Cisco.... Tu te pete les bretelles, mais tu devrais pas trop, on dirais que tu sais fucking rien, tu reste toujorus vage et tu donne des reponse googlé sur le coin de la table... My 2 tabarnak de cennes

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204792404577229074023195322.html giving the United Nations unprecedented powers over the Internet. Dozens of countries, including Russia and China, are pushing hard to reach this goal by year's end. As Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said last June, his goal and that of his allies is to establish "international control over the Internet" through the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a treaty-based organization under U.N. auspices. If successful, these new regulatory proposals would upend the Internet's flourishing regime, which has been in place since 1988. That year, delegates from 114 countries gathered in Australia to agree to a treaty that set the stage for dramatic liberalization of international telecommunications. This insulated the Internet from economic and technical regulation and quickly became the greatest deregulatory success story of all time. Since the Net's inception, engineers, academics, user groups and others have convened in bottom-up nongovernmental organizations to keep it operating and thriving through what is known as a "multi-stakeholder" governance model. This consensus-driven private-sector approach has been the key to the Net's phenomenal success. In 1995, shortly after it was privatized, only 16 million people used the Internet world-wide. By 2011, more than two billion were online—and that number is growing by as much as half a million every day. This explosive growth is the direct result of governments generally keeping their hands off the Internet sphere. Net access, especially through mobile devices, is improving the human condition more quickly—and more fundamentally—than any other technology in history. Nowhere is this more true than in the developing world, where unfettered Internet technologies are expanding economies and raising living standards. Enlarge Image Corbis Farmers who live far from markets are now able to find buyers for their crops through their Internet-connected mobile devices without assuming the risks and expenses of traveling with their goods. Worried parents are able to go online to locate medicine for their sick children. And proponents of political freedom are better able to share information and organize support to break down the walls of tyranny. The Internet has also been a net job creator. A recent McKinsey study found that for every job disrupted by Internet connectivity, 2.6 new jobs are created. It is no coincidence that these wonderful developments blossomed as the Internet migrated further away from government control. Today, however, Russia, China and their allies within the 193 member states of the ITU want to renegotiate the 1988 treaty to expand its reach into previously unregulated areas. Reading even a partial list of proposals that could be codified into international law next December at a conference in Dubai is chilling: • Subject cyber security and data privacy to international control; • Allow foreign phone companies to charge fees for "international" Internet traffic, perhaps even on a "per-click" basis for certain Web destinations, with the goal of generating revenue for state-owned phone companies and government treasuries; • Impose unprecedented economic regulations such as mandates for rates, terms and conditions for currently unregulated traffic-swapping agreements known as "peering." • Establish for the first time ITU dominion over important functions of multi-stakeholder Internet governance entities such as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the nonprofit entity that coordinates the .com and .org Web addresses of the world; • Subsume under intergovernmental control many functions of the Internet Engineering Task Force, the Internet Society and other multi-stakeholder groups that establish the engineering and technical standards that allow the Internet to work; • Regulate international mobile roaming rates and practices. Many countries in the developing world, including India and Brazil, are particularly intrigued by these ideas. Even though Internet-based technologies are improving billions of lives everywhere, some governments feel excluded and want more control. And let's face it, strong-arm regimes are threatened by popular outcries for political freedom that are empowered by unfettered Internet connectivity. They have formed impressive coalitions, and their efforts have progressed significantly. Merely saying "no" to any changes to the current structure of Internet governance is likely to be a losing proposition. A more successful strategy would be for proponents of Internet freedom and prosperity within every nation to encourage a dialogue among all interested parties, including governments and the ITU, to broaden the multi-stakeholder umbrella with the goal of reaching consensus to address reasonable concerns. As part of this conversation, we should underscore the tremendous benefits that the Internet has yielded for the developing world through the multi-stakeholder model. Upending this model with a new regulatory treaty is likely to partition the Internet as some countries would inevitably choose to opt out. A balkanized Internet would be devastating to global free trade and national sovereignty. It would impair Internet growth most severely in the developing world but also globally as technologists are forced to seek bureaucratic permission to innovate and invest. This would also undermine the proliferation of new cross-border technologies, such as cloud computing. A top-down, centralized, international regulatory overlay is antithetical to the architecture of the Net, which is a global network of networks without borders. No government, let alone an intergovernmental body, can make engineering and economic decisions in lightning-fast Internet time. Productivity, rising living standards and the spread of freedom everywhere, but especially in the developing world, would grind to a halt as engineering and business decisions become politically paralyzed within a global regulatory body. Any attempts to expand intergovernmental powers over the Internet—no matter how incremental or seemingly innocuous—should be turned back. Modernization and reform can be constructive, but not if the end result is a new global bureaucracy that departs from the multi-stakeholder model. Enlightened nations should draw a line in the sand against new regulations while welcoming reform that could include a nonregulatory role for the ITU. Pro-regulation forces are, thus far, much more energized and organized than those who favor the multi-stakeholder approach. Regulation proponents only need to secure a simple majority of the 193 member states to codify their radical and counterproductive agenda. Unlike the U.N. Security Council, no country can wield a veto in ITU proceedings. With this in mind, some estimate that approximately 90 countries could be supporting intergovernmental Net regulation—a mere seven short of a majority. While precious time ticks away, the U.S. has not named a leader for the treaty negotiation. We must awake from our slumber and engage before it is too late. Not only do these developments have the potential to affect the daily lives of all Americans, they also threaten freedom and prosperity across the globe. Mr. McDowell is a commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission.

yep edit : oups c les bobines les carrés si je me rapelle bien. un vrm c'est comme un mosfet

p-t juste pauvre dans vie?

...

De la a dire qu'il est nul pas tant...

Il a pas de LCD 1080p..

entraide.net a juste des petites machine, c pour ça qui est minimaliste, si il aurais un peu de io il chanerais de discour.

entraide.net rip des vhs

cool clavier.

Surment que le 5.1 c'est aussi une nuisance !

Design new bureau

Salut Bettie, présente toi !!! http://www.quebecgeeks.net/forums/viewtopic.php?id=6539

quelques mois = minimum 6 d'après moi..... c pas bruyant un hdd..

Thx mec c'est apprécié

Fraudais voir, ya moyen de voir avec lui le genre de système utilisé Manny ? pour le NIA, je vais essayer de m'en trouver un et de tester sur moi. C'est pour un ancien collège de travail, il a la forme rapide de la maladie et est plus capable de marcher... il a été diag vla 8 mois.

Je pense que tu connais pas la Sclérose latérale amyotrophique

Thx Carte dans la malle, devrais recevoir today ou demain Setup Raid 0 3X SSD Intel 510 en Sata3

SSD INTEL 510 120GO Devinex ce qui s'en vient... SSD de 360GO FTW.

Pourquoi tu penses que je cherche un grement comme ça, surment pas pour remplacer ma main...