Nvidia GTX600 / Kepler / En vente depuis le 22 mars.

Bin la...un manné À 500$ ...Y sorte de quoi de nouveau,faut bin se soit plus puissant,sa vien remplacé ...

Ont se fait tellement fourré dans ste d'informatique la quand ont y pensse quelque seconde.

@ 500$ aujourd'hui tu as une GTX580. Les prochaines cartes + performante que la 580 vont être le même prix ou + cher. Ça toujours été comme ça. C'est pour ça que Nvidia baisse leur prix, pour placer leur ancienne génération vis à vis ATI/AMD, écouler leur stock et faire place à Kepler. Nvidia ne se tieront pas dans le pied en vendent des carte + ancienne + cher ou le même prix...

D'ailleurs 500$ c'est "relativement" pas cher si on compare le prix des cartes vidéo back 2002-2006.

Geforce4 TI 4800 550$

ATI X850XTPE 800$

ATI X1900XTX 850$

Geforce 6800Ultra 850$

Geforce 7800GTX700$

Geforce 8800Ultra 800$

Maintenant @ 700-800$ tu as une bi GPU et les single GPU sont entre 550 et 650$ à la sortie.

Tout se concrétise de plus en plus.

Specifications showing up all around

We already wrote that Nvidia planned to hold a GTX 680 related event yesterday, and it is no wonder that we now have a bit more info regarding the card, while Chiphell has provided a much more clear picture of the actual card.

It looks like our sources were spot on yesterday when we heard that the new GTX 680 will feature two 6-pin PCI-Express connectors and have a TDP of around 200W (190W to be precise). When combined with 1536 shader units, 2GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 6GHz and, according to what we heard, a very high GPU clock, it comes as no surprise that Nvidia is claiming higher performance per Watt for its upcoming GTX 680.

This is a big win for Nvidia as we aren't used to hearing performance per Watt from Nvidia and now it appears that the tide has turned. The performance of the GTX 680 is somewhere around Radeon HD 7970 as it wins in some games and benchmarks and loses in others. Of course, these are all results that came from Nvidia so we'll hold our judgement until we see some reviews.

As noted before, the card is based on Nvidia 28nm GK104 Kepler chip that is around 300mm² in size.

The bad part of the story is that our sources were again spot on with the US $549 price tag. Nvidia has a card with similar performance and better TDP so the US $549 price tag isn't really a surprise. We guess that Nvidia has additional maneuvering room when it comes to price and we just need to wait and see if AMD is going to bite down and head into a new round of price wars.

Nvidia GTX 680 to go against HD 7970

Better performance per Watt, same price

According to rumours that we are hearing from our sources close to company, it appears that the upcoming Nvidia GTX 680 graphics based on the GK104 Kepler GPU will be priced at around US $550, basically the same price as the AMD Radeon HD 7970. We are also hearing that Nvidia made a quite bold claim, promising to deliver better performance per Watt than the competition.

We are still trying to chase down more sources and try to confirm some other rumours, but for now we are hearing that the performance should be quite similar to the Radeon HD 7970 as the new GTX 680 card wins in some benchmarks and games and lose in some others. Overall it should win most DirectX 11 benchmarks, at least that is what we are hearing.

We are also currently hearing that the TDP should be somewhere around 200W and it will need two 6-pin PCI-Express power connectors.

The decision to go for a $550 price tag doesn't come as a surprise although we were hoping that Nvidia might go for a lower price in order to hurt AMD sales and restart those price wars we all love. Of course, price is never carved in stone and Nvidia can easily change it, but for now, our sources are pretty sure about it.

You should take these claims with a grain of salt as we are still talking about gossip and we are unable to confirm the details. Hopefully we'll see more info as we draw closer to the launch date.

Dual GK104 card comes in Q2

A lot of power

Let’s spice things up a bit. Nvidia is about to launch the GTX680 on or around March 22 and it the following quarter, Q2, it plans to launch a dual-chip card based on two GK104 chips.

Since we already wrote that a single GK104 should fare quite well against Radeon HD 7970, wining some and losing some benchmarks, it looks like the dual-chip card will be quite a performer.

Nvidia needs something with two chips to hold the water before the GK110 comes along, since GK110 is the real high-end chip that was intended to fight in the high end market. However, the GK110 will not be ready in months and by the time it appears AMD’s next generation could be just around the corner. In fact, it would be unfair to even compare the GK110 to current generation Radeons, which will be more than nine months old by the time GK110 shows up.

We think that Nvidia will have to reduce the clock and shave a few shaders off the GK104 in order to put two chips on a single card, as currently a single GK104, GTX 680 card ends up close to 200W TDP.

Another big downside to this card is that it will end up really expensive.

Les premières Kepler devraient arriver d'ici 2 semaine

le retour des pci-e connector empilé? why not?

Beau design. Malheureusement je peux pas l'acheter. On sais pas si ce sera le MEILLEUR single gpu de nvidia pour Kepler... Ma attendre de savoir lequel c'est et je l'achète si ça en vaut la peine.

sa change koi sa soit des conecteur empiler si les carte sont pour etre de toute facon des dual slot a l'origine ....

on s'en caliss tu je fesais juste remarquer qu'ils étaient empiler.

C'est bad pour ceux qui w/c

+1 dnll.

ouin c'est clair que ça sera pas beau avec un WB. mais personne roule de carte collé en single slot single bracket. Anyway les DVI sont empilé aussi donc impossible de faire un single slot avec.

Ce sera juste esthétique alors.

+1 ! dire je m'en allais la sortir celle la des dvi empiler ...

+1 ! dire je m'en allais la sortir celle la des dvi empiler ...

Malheureusement... Pour quelqu'un qui roule du 3 / 4ways SLI, on oubli la carte de son ou autre cartes... C'était l'avantage d'avoir des waterblock single slot...

Si vous allez voir sur EVGA, persque toutes leur GTX580 ( toutes je crois ) sont capable d'être single slot donc avec un WB et une backplate tu es en business ! Un maniac (fointé) qui veut son Revodrive 3 X2, ses 4 GTX580 et une carte de son sur une cartes mère qui à assez de PCIe en serait capable

Déclaré par Nvidia ... mais bon !

GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA

GPU vendors tend to give out their own performance figures of the products they're launching, compared to competitors' products. In one such comparison, allegedly of the GeForce GTX 680, doing rounds on the internet, NVIDIA's new GPU was evaluated by its makers be be over 40% faster than the Radeon HD 7970 in some tests. Keeping Radeon HD 7970 as a baseline, NVIDIA presented its performance figures for the GeForce GTX 680's leads over it, and Radeon HD 7950's trails under it. Results of as many as 15 tests were presented, from 7 games/benchmarks. All benchmarks were run with and without AA. The one test that caught the eye is Battlefield 3 with "4xAA". Experts we spoke to think NVIDIA could be using FXAA algorithm. In any case, NVIDIA looks to be confident of taking back the fastest-GPU crown from AMD.

Vrai ou pas ?

GeForce GTX 680 Specifications Sheet Leaked

Chinese media site PCOnline.com.cn released what it claims to be an except from the press-deck of NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 680 launch, reportedly scheduled for March 22. The specs sheet is in tune with a lot of information that we already came across on the internet, when preparing our older reports. To begin with the GeForce GTX 680 features clock speeds of 1006 MHz (base), and 1058 MHz (boost). The memory is clocked at a stellar 6.00 GHz (1500 MHz actual), with a memory bus width of 256-bit, it should churn out memory bandwidth of 192 GB/s. 2 GB is the standard memory amount.

For the umpteenth time, this GPU does feature 1,536 CUDA cores. The card draws power from two 6-pin PCIe power connectors. The GPU's TDP is rated at 195W. Display outputs include two DVI, and one each of HDMI and DisplayPort. Like with the new-generation GPUs from AMD, it supports PCI-Express 3.0 x16 bus interface, which could particularly benefit Ivy Bridge and Sandy Bridge-E systems, in cases where the link width is reduced to PCI-Express 3.0 x8 when there are multiple graphics cards installed.

Si c'était vrai, on est loin de 3X + performant qu'une GTX580

Et si c'était vrai pour une seconde foit, je garde mon SLI de GTX580

Si c'était vrai, on est loin de 3X + performant qu'une GTX580

Et si c'était vrai pour une seconde foit, je garde mon SLI de GTX580

La 680 est le mid/high de Kepler ... c'est pas encore le high/end !

Je m'avoue très déçue des 1536SP .... 3x plus de SP pour ~40% de perf .... y dorme au gaz ?

Edit : Ça donne quand même un Mid/high qui est déjà ~50% mieux qu'une GTX580.

Edited March 14, 2012 by Boulard83

selon le graphique c'est à peine 10% sur la HD7970 à part le cas particulier de BF3 avec l'AA (question de drivers ça).

rien pour pleurer à sa mère.

on aime ca les spéculation

La 680 est le mid/high de Kepler ... c'est pas encore le high/end !

Non ben là ! Si c'est ca, quoi bon :klem: Il faut attendre encore merde pour avoir du high/end ?

Si ca continue je vais avec AMD HD 7970

va y fort danny... Nvidia va sortir un single GPU plus fort c'est certain alors va falloir attendre.

Attendez 2 semaines, on verra ce que ça donne !

23 ou 24 mars si jme rappel bien.

Si c'était vrai, on est loin de 3X + performant qu'une GTX580

Et si c'était vrai pour une seconde foit, je garde mon SLI de GTX580

La 680 est le mid/high de Kepler ... c'est pas encore le high/end !

Je m'avoue très déçue des 1536SP .... 3x plus de SP pour ~40% de perf .... y dorme au gaz ?

Edit : Ça donne quand même un Mid/high qui est déjà ~50% mieux qu'une GTX580.

C'est ce que je te disait quand tu me parlais des 1536SP donc 3X les specs d'une 580, ça reste que des chiffres et ça ne se compare pas au ancienne génération Je changerais pas mon setup high end actuel contre un mid end légèrement meilleur pour le prix fort. Le jour que Nvidia va sortir le vrai high end, les prix seront similaire mais les gain seront considérable. J'espère que les prochaine gen ne seront pas tous comme la photo, dual slot...

Les graphiques/bench qui sorte des compagnie directement ne valent pas grand chose. Souvenez vous avec le Fermi (480), c'était censé être de la bombe mais c'était pas aussi bon qu'il l'avait annoncé finalement. Même chose avec le bulldozer, beaucoup + performant sur les graphiques avant la sortit et de la scrap le jour que sa sort... Ça dit quel dalle pour moi.

Reste à voir les bench en très haute résolution pour comparer à la HD7970. En 1920/1080 ça pourrait être 40% + rapide qu'une 7970 dans le meilleur des cas (1jeu peut-être) mais en surround avec seulement 256bit de bus mémoire, - de "bandwith" que la 7970 et 2gb, la j'ai des doutes. Si c'est une sorte de "8800GT", performante comme la 8800GTX sur plusieurs résolution mais de la scrap quand tu monte en très haute résolution avec le AA/SSAO etc, ça va être décevant. :/

C'est surtout ceux qui ont 3-4 carte vidéo qui veulent upgrader leur setup 3 écrans pour aller chercher + de FPS. Les autres en single screen ne sont pas mal prit avec les gen actuel.

Déclaré par Nvidia ... mais bon !

GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA

GPU vendors tend to give out their own performance figures of the products they're launching, compared to competitors' products. In one such comparison, allegedly of the GeForce GTX 680, doing rounds on the internet, NVIDIA's new GPU was evaluated by its makers be be over 40% faster than the Radeon HD 7970 in some tests. Keeping Radeon HD 7970 as a baseline, NVIDIA presented its performance figures for the GeForce GTX 680's leads over it, and Radeon HD 7950's trails under it. Results of as many as 15 tests were presented, from 7 games/benchmarks. All benchmarks were run with and without AA. The one test that caught the eye is Battlefield 3 with "4xAA". Experts we spoke to think NVIDIA could be using FXAA algorithm. In any case, NVIDIA looks to be confident of taking back the fastest-GPU crown from AMD.

http://www.techpowerup.com/img/12-03-13/148a.png

Vrai ou pas ?

GeForce GTX 680 Specifications Sheet Leaked

Chinese media site PCOnline.com.cn released what it claims to be an except from the press-deck of NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 680 launch, reportedly scheduled for March 22. The specs sheet is in tune with a lot of information that we already came across on the internet, when preparing our older reports. To begin with the GeForce GTX 680 features clock speeds of 1006 MHz (base), and 1058 MHz (boost). The memory is clocked at a stellar 6.00 GHz (1500 MHz actual), with a memory bus width of 256-bit, it should churn out memory bandwidth of 192 GB/s. 2 GB is the standard memory amount.

For the umpteenth time, this GPU does feature 1,536 CUDA cores. The card draws power from two 6-pin PCIe power connectors. The GPU's TDP is rated at 195W. Display outputs include two DVI, and one each of HDMI and DisplayPort. Like with the new-generation GPUs from AMD, it supports PCI-Express 3.0 x16 bus interface, which could particularly benefit Ivy Bridge and Sandy Bridge-E systems, in cases where the link width is reduced to PCI-Express 3.0 x8 when there are multiple graphics cards installed.

http://www.techpowerup.com/img/12-03-13/148b.jpg

Techpowerup est pourtant un site fiable,pourquoi devrait-ont prendre sa à la légère?

LA carte sort bientot,c'est sur qui fini par avoir des fuite.

Parce que ce sont des bench qui sorte directement de Nvidia, donc toujours en rapport avec du marketing afin de semer le doute pour ceux qui magasinaient une carte vidéo de 500$.

ca va chauffer dans quelques jours

J'attend la précommande Je vais acheter une carte pour commencer et la tester et a partir de là je vais décider. Si je l'aime pas elle va finir dans le HTPC.